Related%20passage for Eruvin 110:2
ואיתמר רב הונא אמר קרפף לזו וקרפף לזו וחייא בר רב אמר אין נותנין אלא קרפף אחד לשניהם
between two towns,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That were adjacent to one another and that, on account of the karpafs, joined to form one town (cf. supra, p. 387, n. 13 and the discussion infra 57bf) .');"><sup>3</sup></span> and in connect ion with this it was stated: R'Huna laid down: A karpaf is allowed for each town, while R'Hiyya B'Rab held: Only one karpaf is allowed for both towns?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As two sections of one town could not in this respect be subject to greater restrictions than two independent towns that are adjacent to one another, what need was there for R. Huna's ruling in respect of one town that was only severed in two on account of a breach?');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 110:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.